So, think what you will of the Ed Potton article in The Sunday Times (thanks to RAUS on Facebook for the text) but that right there is some absolutely awesome alliteration Armitage!
I highly doubt that Richard Armitage is unaware that he is *moderately* attractive 😉 but rather than sounding like a completely self absorbed tool by replying “yeah, I know, I’m a stone cold fox,” he generally gives a modest shrug off to questions about his physical appeal. This is nothing new, he’s been doing it forever. The age based qualifier is something kind of new though and it stuck me as rather funny since 43 is hardly qualified for geezerdom.
This whole topic reminded me vividly of a list my friends and I had as twenty year old college students two decades ago…a compilation of singers, actors and other celebs we classified as 40 and F*#kable. A few of the front runners in 1991?
And so on. Considering that Sean Connery was in his early 60’s at the time we 20’s compiled our short list, I’d say that Richard Armitage’s “totty-ness” is fairly secure for a good while.
I do have to admit something though…
It is *totally* disconcerting that the new object of my affections is so wholly age appropriate! Hmph!